Hugh Robert Duff, Esq. - A.Conne - J. Tait v. James Grant, Esq. - Mackenzi - R. Grant [1824] UKHL 2_Shaw_310a (9 June 1824)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

Page: 310

(1824) 2 Shaw 310a

CASES DECIDED IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS, ON APPEAL FROM THE COURTS OF SCOTLAND, 1824.

2 d Division.

No. 41.


Hugh Robert Duff, Esq.     Appellant.—A.Connel—J. Tait

v.

James Grant, Esq.     Respondent.—Mackenzie—R. Grant

June 9. 1824.

Lord Pitmilly.

This was a question, whether a small piece of ground, called the Kilnhead or Kilnlead, belonged to the appellant or the respondent, the decision of which depended upon the terms of their titles. Duff having brought an action for having it found that it belonged to him, the Lord Ordinary assoilzied Grant, and to this judgment the Court adhered on the 21st June 1822. * Duff then entered an appeal; but the House of Lords “ordered and adjudged, that the appeal be dismissed, and the interlocutors complained of affirmed, with L. 150 costs.”

Solicitors: J. Chalmer— Spottiswoode and Robertson, —Solicitors.

(Ap. Ca. No. 54.)

_________________ Footnote _________________

* See 1. Shaw and Ballantine, No. 565.

1824
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0